Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-19 17:24:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87DED19B2E75D4F066892FE6091DA591CE1BD2FB7B606FC91A34BEDBC2E7B8D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tha author never claims the paper was peer reviewed by the Lancet when it was first published in 2023. He claims the paper was censored and cancelled which it was. It has now been reviewed and should be published again https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.14680

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803460193163915711
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87DED19B2E75D4F066892FE6091DA591CE1BD2FB7B606FC91A34BEDBC2E7B8D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1718817893796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180346019316391571187DED19B2E75D4F066892FE6091DA591CE1BD2FB7B606FC91A34BEDBC2E7B8D8