Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-18 23:57:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 404E0EC07F56B261AC91C559DFEA1CBACB4D0AB790A084CE0158FFDA8E46DC7B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note needed. When a website (especially an unreliable one as seen from the proposed note) deletes a news article, it’s generally accepted that is a retraction of an erroneous or false story. Having an archived copy of a false article does not make it any more true.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803180538695655639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 404E0EC07F56B261AC91C559DFEA1CBACB4D0AB790A084CE0158FFDA8E46DC7B
  • createdAtMillis - 1718755063457
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1803180538695655639404E0EC07F56B261AC91C559DFEA1CBACB4D0AB790A084CE0158FFDA8E46DC7B