Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-18 23:45:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20AB0CEFEB0E4EC6CE8D0C0A0D7E32D180F699F5FBA513D6B8986A14D39FC4AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note needed. When a website (especially an unreliable one as seen from the proposed note) deletes a news article, it’s generally accepted that is a retraction of an erroneous or false story. Having an archived copy of a false article does not make it any more true.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803180538695655639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20AB0CEFEB0E4EC6CE8D0C0A0D7E32D180F699F5FBA513D6B8986A14D39FC4AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1718754331906
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180318053869565563920AB0CEFEB0E4EC6CE8D0C0A0D7E32D180F699F5FBA513D6B8986A14D39FC4AA