Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-19 13:38:35 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 77F3621FF8FA173FA4ACD668DF010C276EAE695AC375074FD5F7766FA71A337C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The claim the COVID Proximal Origins paper "represents scientific misconduct up to & including fraud" is not universally accepted by scientists. Accusations of scientific fraud lack evidence. Further research support the conclusions of proximal origins study: https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(21)00991-0 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8337 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8715 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.202000325 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bies.202100194 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2202871119
All Note Details