Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-18 16:34:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

They claim they paid £144k for the company to carry out the vetting. No evidence gave against that. It's an assumption to say this didn't occur and that the only service they could have possibly have had was to vet people themselves on the platform. Other tweets are not a source.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803099852781330867
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1718728486934
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18030998527813308673EA96C280D54E6A46971354855F0D1E18387352FC67FE4A40E9E014FBF52A5BC