Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-18 16:45:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2966F751814C98D8521EF8EEEACC8511A4510843645B36574390DC214DD76015
Participant Details

Original Note:

They claim they paid £144k for the company to carry out the vetting. No evidence gave against that. It's an assumption to say this didn't occur and that the only service they could have possibly have had was to vet people themselves on the platform. Other tweets are not a source.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803099852781330867
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2966F751814C98D8521EF8EEEACC8511A4510843645B36574390DC214DD76015
  • createdAtMillis - 1718729137171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18030998527813308672966F751814C98D8521EF8EEEACC8511A4510843645B36574390DC214DD76015