Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-19 01:30:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B0FDD391E1E80DFF97B101658BBB761C6D6A9E82A0759155FA07B11F472C38E
Participant Details

Original Note:

They claim they paid £144k for the company to carry out the vetting. No evidence gave against that. It's an assumption to say this didn't occur and that the only service they could have possibly have had was to vet people themselves on the platform. Other tweets are not a source.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803099852781330867
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B0FDD391E1E80DFF97B101658BBB761C6D6A9E82A0759155FA07B11F472C38E
  • createdAtMillis - 1718760641464
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18030998527813308670B0FDD391E1E80DFF97B101658BBB761C6D6A9E82A0759155FA07B11F472C38E