Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-18 16:24:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C05CDA89D13872E50B3D6778E1207985F46FC68CF57989ED21C0495DE959504
Participant Details

Original Note:

nnn - They know there is no solid evidence, hence their use of the word “reported”, so the tweet is correct The source on the note also contains no information of who is, or is not involved in the production

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803085819894260104
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C05CDA89D13872E50B3D6778E1207985F46FC68CF57989ED21C0495DE959504
  • createdAtMillis - 1718727869336
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18030858198942601043C05CDA89D13872E50B3D6778E1207985F46FC68CF57989ED21C0495DE959504