Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-18 11:43:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3411D61C7816D12078E6C3286F4495A56FEA74AE431299C8319444C69DA5417
Participant Details

Original Note:

As CN'ers we have to say yes or no to this statement before posting: "Given current evidence, I believe this post is likely...Potentially misleading and would benefit from added context." The fact the £30bn is not explained is important context and better for CN than reply. https://t.co/BttBtgwN8v

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803013214843609230
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3411D61C7816D12078E6C3286F4495A56FEA74AE431299C8319444C69DA5417
  • createdAtMillis - 1718710984396
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1803013214843609230D3411D61C7816D12078E6C3286F4495A56FEA74AE431299C8319444C69DA5417