Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-18 02:29:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6FC8DABC67901B8AEDAFA3D1BFC1802BD6D1D34726836473170DD4944F22BE92
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN This argument of semantics has been going since the Lollards brought their “conclusions” before the English Parliament in the early 15th century and before. Community notes can’t solve a centuries old battle simply by citing one side of the issue. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lollardy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802838063552286798
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6FC8DABC67901B8AEDAFA3D1BFC1802BD6D1D34726836473170DD4944F22BE92
  • createdAtMillis - 1718677763879
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18028380635522867986FC8DABC67901B8AEDAFA3D1BFC1802BD6D1D34726836473170DD4944F22BE92