Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-18 00:38:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86
Participant Details

Original Note:

掲示されているデータはいずれも2018年までのデータであり、2期8年の結果を示すデータとしては不適切で、事実誤認を招いています。 東京新聞が6月16日時点での検証結果をまとめています。 https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/333854

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802805406177386856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86
  • createdAtMillis - 1718671117958
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1802805406177386856EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86