Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-17 23:21:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E8805D9C88CB065C6CD6818ECD66D3BE6A2F045BC61F7AE40BCF49C1C026EE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

掲示されているデータはいずれも2018年までのデータであり、2期8年の結果を示すデータとしては不適切で、事実誤認を招いています。 東京新聞が6月16日時点での検証結果をまとめています。 https://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/333854

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802805406177386856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E8805D9C88CB065C6CD6818ECD66D3BE6A2F045BC61F7AE40BCF49C1C026EE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1718666476596
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18028054061773868569E8805D9C88CB065C6CD6818ECD66D3BE6A2F045BC61F7AE40BCF49C1C026EE6