Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 21:40:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83601C99575B7D1F167543D60E84D13445BB20FCDF04F992998EB1C191656021
Participant Details

Original Note:

Additional Context: The issue in Garland v Cargill is that Congress has passed no law concerning bump stocks and that the ATF exceeded its statutory authority provided by Congress by banning them on their own. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976_e29g.pdf https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-backs-challenge-federal-ban-gun-bump-stocks-2024-06-14/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802440158144532889
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83601C99575B7D1F167543D60E84D13445BB20FCDF04F992998EB1C191656021
  • createdAtMillis - 1718574014641
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180244015814453288983601C99575B7D1F167543D60E84D13445BB20FCDF04F992998EB1C191656021