Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-17 00:35:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 711B65465FF265D80154FDA83E43AAE424B9D543A62D3DCC5EEDAFF1E25E9E20
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court did not rule on a law, but rather on whether an Executive Branch agency has the authority to change a law to have a new meaning without Congress. The ruling specifically pointed out that Congress can in fact change the law if they want to: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976_e29g.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802433093216989500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 711B65465FF265D80154FDA83E43AAE424B9D543A62D3DCC5EEDAFF1E25E9E20
  • createdAtMillis - 1718584510727
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1802433093216989500711B65465FF265D80154FDA83E43AAE424B9D543A62D3DCC5EEDAFF1E25E9E20