Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-17 02:29:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 253F27CBE38B42CEE0BE9E94CD3D716CF7A819E2C51CC0F191CEB6797394C017
Participant Details

Original Note:

The issue in this case wasn't the second amendment, but rather whether a gun equipped with a "bump stock" meets the definition of a machine gun under the NFA. https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-bump-stock-ban/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802409006591262890
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 253F27CBE38B42CEE0BE9E94CD3D716CF7A819E2C51CC0F191CEB6797394C017
  • createdAtMillis - 1718591388735
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1802409006591262890253F27CBE38B42CEE0BE9E94CD3D716CF7A819E2C51CC0F191CEB6797394C017