Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 18:13:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5146BAD977B0AEB73EA9A91500A87ED12D832E4F8AE259F03324FC5B60E5A1E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS did not overturn a law banning bump stocks. They overturned an executive branch agency interpretation. One that was clearly improper. This ruling now lets congress, the appropriate branch, to act. https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-bump-stock-ban/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802336064537031072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5146BAD977B0AEB73EA9A91500A87ED12D832E4F8AE259F03324FC5B60E5A1E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1718993618728
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18023360645370310725146BAD977B0AEB73EA9A91500A87ED12D832E4F8AE259F03324FC5B60E5A1E9