Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 13:26:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B73429D5113C5B75F0D948020E7CA064E3325135D516A95B60AEF57AFB79556F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Le tweet n'a rien à voir avec la méthodologie de Cluster17. Notes Inutiles. De plus les résultats de Cluster17 ont été excellent dans plusieurs élections (Présidentielles de 2022, Européenne de 2024, élection régionale en Catalogne) https://cluster17.com/meilleurs-sondeurs/ https://cluster17.com/cluster-17-classe-meilleur-sondeur-pour-lelection-regionale-en-catalogne/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1802276966369812592
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B73429D5113C5B75F0D948020E7CA064E3325135D516A95B60AEF57AFB79556F
createdAtMillis - 1718544406575
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1802276966369812592B73429D5113C5B75F0D948020E7CA064E3325135D516A95B60AEF57AFB79556F