Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 06:26:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C16412A0234FA580C2C90E5E62E4E0035478E1DEE94A73B2C4B6DF5C1EA6C1B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Despite her secondary sexual characteristics, we don't actually know for fact that Sarah is male. Secondly, everyone already perceives her as biologically male (and the post isn't challenging that), there's no reason to restate the obvious.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802191551323336915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C16412A0234FA580C2C90E5E62E4E0035478E1DEE94A73B2C4B6DF5C1EA6C1B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1718519198688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1802191551323336915C16412A0234FA580C2C90E5E62E4E0035478E1DEE94A73B2C4B6DF5C1EA6C1B6