Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-17 20:29:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86DDFA1A4B5426069FE867859A6B6754136BAE222B48B76A9B5579C0C50ACFD6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Despite her secondary sexual characteristics, we don't actually know for fact that Sarah is male. Secondly, everyone already perceives her as biologically male (and the post isn't challenging that), there's no reason to restate the obvious.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802191551323336915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86DDFA1A4B5426069FE867859A6B6754136BAE222B48B76A9B5579C0C50ACFD6
  • createdAtMillis - 1718656151269
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180219155132333691586DDFA1A4B5426069FE867859A6B6754136BAE222B48B76A9B5579C0C50ACFD6