Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 14:45:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AE7987AF57EC2061E4FDDE5CD955E0F0E33C61614F6DCB45DDBDF99EC44EEE8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Despite her secondary sexual characteristics, we don't actually know for fact that Sarah is male. Secondly, everyone already perceives her as biologically male (and the post isn't challenging that), there's no reason to restate the obvious.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802191551323336915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AE7987AF57EC2061E4FDDE5CD955E0F0E33C61614F6DCB45DDBDF99EC44EEE8
  • createdAtMillis - 1718549133116
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18021915513233369156AE7987AF57EC2061E4FDDE5CD955E0F0E33C61614F6DCB45DDBDF99EC44EEE8