Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 06:02:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 604A81A3A4438186529F2643F40E2848D1C001AE62CA2448F69441C19EEBF406
Participant Details

Original Note:

Despite her secondary sexual characteristics, we don't actually know for fact that Sarah is male. Secondly, everyone already perceives her as biologically male (and the post isn't challenging that), there's no reason to restate the obvious.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802191551323336915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 604A81A3A4438186529F2643F40E2848D1C001AE62CA2448F69441C19EEBF406
  • createdAtMillis - 1718517770872
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1802191551323336915604A81A3A4438186529F2643F40E2848D1C001AE62CA2448F69441C19EEBF406