Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-17 13:38:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20B26BB3FED0AB4E1D98D7FA24822ED2638772D0E41428B1E40B09A726C820DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Despite her secondary sexual characteristics, we don't actually know for fact that Sarah is male. Secondly, everyone already perceives her as biologically male (and the post isn't challenging that), there's no reason to restate the obvious.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802191551323336915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20B26BB3FED0AB4E1D98D7FA24822ED2638772D0E41428B1E40B09A726C820DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1718631483639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180219155132333691520B26BB3FED0AB4E1D98D7FA24822ED2638772D0E41428B1E40B09A726C820DC