Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 20:59:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AFF1EBF18D1456AB3FAFF12CB9734D82E915E8B4F9F500B0EF3092BB1FD1127
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, they didn't. Holding: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives exceeded its statutory authority by issuing a rule that classifies a bump stock as a “machinegun” under 26 U.S.C. § 5845(b). https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/garland-v-cargill/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802082985841164694
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5AFF1EBF18D1456AB3FAFF12CB9734D82E915E8B4F9F500B0EF3092BB1FD1127
  • createdAtMillis - 1718485190647
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18020829858411646945AFF1EBF18D1456AB3FAFF12CB9734D82E915E8B4F9F500B0EF3092BB1FD1127