Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 16:50:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8BB806B3B8458D0040B7FFB008C0A8BA3F77A3E26645CEFEF19FC63211337FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Even if the House passes a resolution to rescind the subpoenas, this action does not retroactively erase the fact that Bannon did not comply with the original subpoenas when they were valid and in force. Once charges are filed, it becomes a matter for the courts to decide. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL34097.pdf https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL34097

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802075884460909012
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8BB806B3B8458D0040B7FFB008C0A8BA3F77A3E26645CEFEF19FC63211337FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1718556640531
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1802075884460909012A8BB806B3B8458D0040B7FFB008C0A8BA3F77A3E26645CEFEF19FC63211337FA