Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 22:26:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2425BA33FF15D81DB3617F1EA47C993E8436491BECAE817B9675C6076BDBC07D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Even if the House passes a resolution to rescind the subpoenas, this action does not retroactively erase the fact that Bannon did not comply with the original subpoenas when they were valid and in force. Once charges are filed, it becomes a matter for the courts to decide. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL34097.pdf https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL34097

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802075884460909012
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2425BA33FF15D81DB3617F1EA47C993E8436491BECAE817B9675C6076BDBC07D
  • createdAtMillis - 1718490388089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18020758844609090122425BA33FF15D81DB3617F1EA47C993E8436491BECAE817B9675C6076BDBC07D