Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 10:20:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8349D89DC5A9C1829A5FAC6C1E965D85E1C2495BCF441EAA78EE2CA8FC0A26A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article uses baseless accusations, out of context messages and wrongfully translations to paint the company as a terrible sexist environment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghXtEtk9q-Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802021558891823262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8349D89DC5A9C1829A5FAC6C1E965D85E1C2495BCF441EAA78EE2CA8FC0A26A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723112407194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1802021558891823262B8349D89DC5A9C1829A5FAC6C1E965D85E1C2495BCF441EAA78EE2CA8FC0A26A