Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 14:18:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FBC72F2C01D2A990AFD7C886278C0C4A243506C654C50A206C0505F42601F5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article uses baseless accusations, out of context messages and wrongfully translations to paint the company as a terrible sexist environment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghXtEtk9q-Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802021558891823262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FBC72F2C01D2A990AFD7C886278C0C4A243506C654C50A206C0505F42601F5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1718547486001
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18020215588918232623FBC72F2C01D2A990AFD7C886278C0C4A243506C654C50A206C0505F42601F5E