Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 20:27:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 491A137AEF6346BCED7E3AFEDC0EED72B713C373D7C92533335F20C797B450AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Some cases brought to court by the Trump Campaign were dismissed for lack of standing (though judges still addressed merits), some were dismissed strictly on their merits, and many were adjudicated and rulings were issued. Some Trump suits were groundless, resulting in fines. https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsuits-regarding-2020-elections

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802004353064055161
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 491A137AEF6346BCED7E3AFEDC0EED72B713C373D7C92533335F20C797B450AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1718483265062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1802004353064055161491A137AEF6346BCED7E3AFEDC0EED72B713C373D7C92533335F20C797B450AB