Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 15:51:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E19475D92B5AD7B15DA11F895FFEC92409692F67378360AB34C9B37BA532FB0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The methods used by UK Polling Report don't appear to take the scandal surrounding the treatment of well liked, but now independent candates into account. If may not accurately reflect the outcome. https://pollingreport.uk/articles/different-pollsters-methods-a-summary

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801995372014739637
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E19475D92B5AD7B15DA11F895FFEC92409692F67378360AB34C9B37BA532FB0D
  • createdAtMillis - 1718466684062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1801995372014739637E19475D92B5AD7B15DA11F895FFEC92409692F67378360AB34C9B37BA532FB0D