Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 18:14:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FBEE42900C68AAC004312B802CAF7893F128BD2F7A88C8E568C293FAFF05C90
Participant Details

Original Note:

The methods used by UK Polling Report don't appear to take the scandal surrounding the treatment of well liked, but now independent candates into account. If may not accurately reflect the outcome. https://pollingreport.uk/articles/different-pollsters-methods-a-summary

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801995372014739637
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FBEE42900C68AAC004312B802CAF7893F128BD2F7A88C8E568C293FAFF05C90
  • createdAtMillis - 1718475257950
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18019953720147396373FBEE42900C68AAC004312B802CAF7893F128BD2F7A88C8E568C293FAFF05C90