Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 09:06:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F957AF5336DEF76A75DC9C156EAB15739A8A41A77ED3DCB59C8FB860CCB1E6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nuclear energy is widely considered more reliable and stable than renewables, and adopting it would mean a more stable grid. Transitioning to nuclear power does not necessarily imply reliance on coal plants (see France) and its costs are competitive with renewables. https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/FRA https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020 https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/extractiveindustries/publication/managing-coal-mine-closure https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/economic-aspects/economics-of-nuclear-power https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02239-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801884607710728415
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F957AF5336DEF76A75DC9C156EAB15739A8A41A77ED3DCB59C8FB860CCB1E6B
  • createdAtMillis - 1718442401717
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18018846077107284155F957AF5336DEF76A75DC9C156EAB15739A8A41A77ED3DCB59C8FB860CCB1E6B