Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 15:18:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FEEFF4F980A2961BD583C8E0C18B742E2318F952ED965E6F46D252FBA0FF9659
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS did not protect abortion pills, it simply found a lack of plaintiff's standing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-235_n7ip.pdf https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-preserves-access-to-abortion-pill/ But the post likely talks about "access to [in-clinic] abortion", banned in many states: https://edition.cnn.com/us/abortion-access-restrictions-bans-us-dg/index.html Bump stocks allow semiautomatic weapons to fire at nearly the rate of a machine gun. https://www.axios.com/2024/06/14/bump-stocks-supreme-court-ban-how-works https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/14/us/politics/supreme-court-trump-gun-bump-stocks.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801847248126464122
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FEEFF4F980A2961BD583C8E0C18B742E2318F952ED965E6F46D252FBA0FF9659
  • createdAtMillis - 1718464712876
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801847248126464122FEEFF4F980A2961BD583C8E0C18B742E2318F952ED965E6F46D252FBA0FF9659