Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-15 12:52:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A9638BB5C3FA34E23D2DF99DA29B0B6DEA7D8C1C35A173311C2A3B5560E554E6
Participant Details
Original Note:
The decision in Cargill v. Garland provides this explanation. Within a longer paragraph is the following: “A bump stock does not alter the basic mechanics of bump firing, and the trigger still must be released and reengaged to fire each additional shot.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976new_0971.pdf
All Note Details