Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-16 00:26:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 793010E0C6F626C5A340EEC71BCA714B563ADE360E7C22B1FD8EE4D2A20A99BC
Participant Details
Original Note:
The decision in Cargill v. Garland provides this explanation. Within a longer paragraph is the following: “A bump stock does not alter the basic mechanics of bump firing, and the trigger still must be released and reengaged to fire each additional shot.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976new_0971.pdf
All Note Details