Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 01:36:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8AA405483D14B293EA44043A5ED8451C94BACB15BEE5C71D832D2CA2A38DF542
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is irrelevant to the Supreme Court’s decision which hinged upon whether the ATF had the authority to expand the definition of “machine gun” to include bump stocks on semi-automatic guns. Further, objects mustn’t be “animate” to be dangerous (e.g. bombs).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801741234160984416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8AA405483D14B293EA44043A5ED8451C94BACB15BEE5C71D832D2CA2A38DF542
  • createdAtMillis - 1718415369102
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18017412341609844168AA405483D14B293EA44043A5ED8451C94BACB15BEE5C71D832D2CA2A38DF542