Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 05:20:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 711B65465FF265D80154FDA83E43AAE424B9D543A62D3DCC5EEDAFF1E25E9E20
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is irrelevant to the Supreme Court’s decision which hinged upon whether the ATF had the authority to expand the definition of “machine gun” to include bump stocks on semi-automatic guns. Further, objects mustn’t be “animate” to be dangerous (e.g. bombs).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801741234160984416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 711B65465FF265D80154FDA83E43AAE424B9D543A62D3DCC5EEDAFF1E25E9E20
  • createdAtMillis - 1718515226850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801741234160984416711B65465FF265D80154FDA83E43AAE424B9D543A62D3DCC5EEDAFF1E25E9E20