Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 01:21:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is irrelevant to the Supreme Court’s decision which hinged upon whether the ATF had the authority to expand the definition of “machine gun” to include bump stocks on semi-automatic guns. Further, objects mustn’t be “animate” to be dangerous (e.g. bombs).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801741234160984416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E
  • createdAtMillis - 1718414462152
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18017412341609844166F07F30133FFC01A3659867CF4C4EA269E332834A1078EE1B272D80661CD280E