Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 21:43:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A2F9C2C049A9A11BA04B5469B4B113141051AFF87E522524EE35E0D3B92812B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is irrelevant to the Supreme Court’s decision which hinged upon whether the ATF had the authority to expand the definition of “machine gun” to include bump stocks on semi-automatic guns. Further, objects mustn’t be “animate” to be dangerous (e.g. bombs).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801741234160984416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6A2F9C2C049A9A11BA04B5469B4B113141051AFF87E522524EE35E0D3B92812B
  • createdAtMillis - 1718574226682
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18017412341609844166A2F9C2C049A9A11BA04B5469B4B113141051AFF87E522524EE35E0D3B92812B