Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 05:57:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 303B48D2BD7DC1DE467F57C7D207FCB2CD49B9920336B70BAB38CD6699769682
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La note de la Commission des sondages date d'il y a plusieurs années et est désormais caduque. La méthodologie utilisée par Cluster 17 depuis cette époque n'a, à ce jour, fait l'objet d'aucune remarque de la Commission. https://www.commission-des-sondages.fr/hist/communiques/index.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801705331329773934
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 303B48D2BD7DC1DE467F57C7D207FCB2CD49B9920336B70BAB38CD6699769682
  • createdAtMillis - 1718431035219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801705331329773934303B48D2BD7DC1DE467F57C7D207FCB2CD49B9920336B70BAB38CD6699769682