Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 20:52:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B666FEF42A69AC9EA1B27BFB1C5E7238827292C77A11A03863A35F7C24C5BA8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The implication is that the court struck it down on 2A grounds, and if that were explicitly stated he would be wrong. However the court struck the ban down on Article I grounds, holding that ATF usurped Legislative authority. He's technically correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801685542859411949
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B666FEF42A69AC9EA1B27BFB1C5E7238827292C77A11A03863A35F7C24C5BA8E
  • createdAtMillis - 1718398330470
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801685542859411949B666FEF42A69AC9EA1B27BFB1C5E7238827292C77A11A03863A35F7C24C5BA8E