Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 22:57:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05F6AF71189FE935F2DD8F9C25C8F91456729AD24D16867CBD11AF7802BD191E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The implication is that the court struck it down on 2A grounds, and if that were explicitly stated he would be wrong. However the court struck the ban down on Article I grounds, holding that ATF usurped Legislative authority. He's technically correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801685542859411949
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05F6AF71189FE935F2DD8F9C25C8F91456729AD24D16867CBD11AF7802BD191E
  • createdAtMillis - 1718405835373
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180168554285941194905F6AF71189FE935F2DD8F9C25C8F91456729AD24D16867CBD11AF7802BD191E