Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 17:57:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4CEF17A46CEF6403B410C4287D852745160082A15CB2799D956C8BB685D1B94
Participant Details

Original Note:

Everything the author wrote is in direct contrast of what was presented by the majority of the USSC in the ruling issued today. He uses LIES and emotional manipulation in an attempt to convince the reader that his opinion is correct versus the opinion of the Court. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/23

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801672836081144000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4CEF17A46CEF6403B410C4287D852745160082A15CB2799D956C8BB685D1B94
  • createdAtMillis - 1718387877703
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801672836081144000D4CEF17A46CEF6403B410C4287D852745160082A15CB2799D956C8BB685D1B94