Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 14:36:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF1B873BA78592572F538C00A37655032CBC237A2C384DCAAEA30767C1589E42
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court did not "effectively legalize machine guns" They ruled that the ATF exceeded its authority by classifying "bump stocks" as machineguns. A "bump stock" does not convert semiautomatic guns into fully automatic guns, as this article claims. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976_e29g.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801658488814277095
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF1B873BA78592572F538C00A37655032CBC237A2C384DCAAEA30767C1589E42
  • createdAtMillis - 1718548603561
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801658488814277095AF1B873BA78592572F538C00A37655032CBC237A2C384DCAAEA30767C1589E42