Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 17:20:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F1F532072E975211163CD78390575B64D299E533917D4BA214BF6582F65B1BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note relies on the opinions of an ideologically-compromised nuclear advocate without a single minute of relevant training or expertise. Confidently stated opinions are not a substitute for the truth even if they are published by equally unqualified columnists. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801581705431814156
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F1F532072E975211163CD78390575B64D299E533917D4BA214BF6582F65B1BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1718472033717
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18015817054318141565F1F532072E975211163CD78390575B64D299E533917D4BA214BF6582F65B1BA