Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-16 06:42:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 329F0EBF6F6641EC7EEDCC69A699E11F15214E175FBF983D577459BFC4A0B5BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note relies on the opinions of an ideologically-compromised nuclear advocate without a single minute of relevant training or expertise. Confidently stated opinions are not a substitute for the truth even if they are published by equally unqualified columnists. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801581705431814156
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 329F0EBF6F6641EC7EEDCC69A699E11F15214E175FBF983D577459BFC4A0B5BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1718520178152
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801581705431814156329F0EBF6F6641EC7EEDCC69A699E11F15214E175FBF983D577459BFC4A0B5BB