Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 10:09:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 803E9A3F85ACA8D12D2FDB75F273A4B1F1B5B72F48B5FB9FFC320C43407F580D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Em tese, a CCJ realmente tem o objetivo de analisar a constitucionalidade da proposta, mas não é o que vemos na prática, já que propostas inconstitucionais são aprovadas. Não há erro na postagem, apenas um fato e a opinião do autor sobre ele.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801424271144591623
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 803E9A3F85ACA8D12D2FDB75F273A4B1F1B5B72F48B5FB9FFC320C43407F580D
  • createdAtMillis - 1718359747424
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801424271144591623803E9A3F85ACA8D12D2FDB75F273A4B1F1B5B72F48B5FB9FFC320C43407F580D