Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 10:33:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5F3E2B248C2D90673EAAB776064550783F6FDE1ACE474C1045F1EA79C8D0A81
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note n’est clairement pas nécessaire. Rappel les notes sont là pour éclaircir un fait qui serait trompeur. Que Monsieur Le Guen soit dans une démarche de réhabilitation est en soit une démarche qu’il faut saluer. https://x.com/coryleguen/status/1801362931306656136?s=46&t=CdgV8i_3Ib3Hf4L0_Kqd_Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1801399390357110885
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E5F3E2B248C2D90673EAAB776064550783F6FDE1ACE474C1045F1EA79C8D0A81
createdAtMillis - 1718361195535
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1801399390357110885E5F3E2B248C2D90673EAAB776064550783F6FDE1ACE474C1045F1EA79C8D0A81