Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 06:42:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FEDEDB18D80047E9FF79305A1F219EC424EC69FB44DEA2762325E36B0590CF10
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context: The Supreme Court has already agreed to hear the case and will be reviewing arguments from both sides presented by the involved parties. Additional amicus briefs, especially if they reiterate arguments already made, may have limited influence on justices' decisions https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/jan.-6-defendant-petitions-supreme-court-over-section-1512(c)(2)-charge https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fischer-v-united-states/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801338141749522557
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FEDEDB18D80047E9FF79305A1F219EC424EC69FB44DEA2762325E36B0590CF10
  • createdAtMillis - 1718433733957
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1801338141749522557FEDEDB18D80047E9FF79305A1F219EC424EC69FB44DEA2762325E36B0590CF10