Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 00:19:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B61EF32C51B44CB77185FD341D74F9EE6AE96EEEE263CEF4E2D262AFC753934
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context: The Supreme Court has already agreed to hear the case and will be reviewing arguments from both sides presented by the involved parties. Additional amicus briefs, especially if they reiterate arguments already made, may have limited influence on justices' decisions https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/jan.-6-defendant-petitions-supreme-court-over-section-1512(c)(2)-charge https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fischer-v-united-states/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801338141749522557
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4B61EF32C51B44CB77185FD341D74F9EE6AE96EEEE263CEF4E2D262AFC753934
  • createdAtMillis - 1718324358092
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18013381417495225574B61EF32C51B44CB77185FD341D74F9EE6AE96EEEE263CEF4E2D262AFC753934