Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-13 18:55:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9851411960F6CDB0BCF2F09FB7802EF37BEDA3138C2EDDABDCC7F96C72E1BC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet doesn't claim it's illegal, it points out it is unusual and there's reason to believe he worked with the CIA. The more is making an entirely different argument.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801252041974755363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9851411960F6CDB0BCF2F09FB7802EF37BEDA3138C2EDDABDCC7F96C72E1BC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1718304946211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801252041974755363E9851411960F6CDB0BCF2F09FB7802EF37BEDA3138C2EDDABDCC7F96C72E1BC9